ANSWER
Researchers have used the self-efficacy theory to investigate individual motivation and behavior since it is a potent and significant psychological concept. It considers a person’s perceptions of their skills and abilities, arguing that they can either be high in self-efficacy (confidence) or low in self-efficacy (lacking belief). Therefore, evaluating this idea before using it in a study is crucial. When determining its authenticity, it is essential to consider both internal and external criticism.
Internal critique evaluates a theory’s capacity to explain the currently available data and any potential future data. Numerous studies support the Self-Efficacy theory’s usefulness in predicting and defining a person’s behavior, such as their persistence when presented with challenging tasks. Additionally, research has demonstrated that interventions meant to boost self-efficacy can have a favorable impact. These findings imply that empirical data well support the Self-Efficacy hypothesis and is, therefore, trustworthy when applied to academic work.
The degree to which the theory agrees with contemporary scientific views from related fields of study is evaluated via external criticism. In this situation, self-efficacy and other psychological ideas like goal-setting theory, locus of control, and attributional style theory have much in common.
Other psychological theories, including goal-setting theory, locus of control, and attributional style theory, all have relationships with self-efficacy. Each of these theories sheds light on a person’s motivations and conduct. As a result, it is possible to evaluate how effectively Self-Efficacy accords with contemporary scientific ideas from related research fields using external criticism.
For instance, various attributional styles have been connected to beliefs in one’s efficacy. The way people explain their triumphs and failures in life is referred to as their attributional style, such as whether they blamed their success or failure on internal or external reasons. According to research, individuals who attribute more internally are likely to have higher levels of self-efficacy than those who attribute more externally.
The degree to which people think they have control over their surroundings and life outcomes is referred to as locus of power, and it has been shown that locus of control and self-efficacy are related. Others with an internal locus of control believe they are mostly responsible for their success or failure. In contrast, others with an external locus of control think that forces beyond their control largely determine life events. According to studies, those with an internal locus of control are likelier to exhibit high levels of self-efficacy than those with an external locus of control.
QUESTION
Using the criteria presented in week 2, critique the theory of Self-Efficacy using the internal and external criticism evaluation process.
This is the criteria presented in week 2 “Making judgement as to whether a theory could be adapted for use in research is very important. Describe the internal and external criticism that is used to evaluate middle range theories.” I have attached work from week 2 as reference
Require 400 words and at least 3 scholarly references no later than 5 years old.
No Plagiarism
