quality improvement initiative » Dissertation Consulting Company.


Improving the Standard of Sepsis Care in The Healthcare Field

In May 2017, the World Health Assembly (WHA) approved a resolution defining sepsis as a global health emergency. According to research, sepsis syndrome is characterized by life-threatening organ dysfunction from a poorly balanced host response to infection. On the other hand, also WHO  established a criterion known as An African Sepsis Alliance initiative to oversee the execution of the WHA resolution. The purpose of this paper is to describe recent developments in knowledge regarding quality improvement initiatives(Arora et al.,2019). The target population affected by the syndrome, the benefits of the quality improvement initiative, an interprofessional collaboration that is required to implement the quality improvement initiative, and finally, the Overall cost

The purpose of optimizing sepsis care as a quality improvement initiative.

Minimizing death rates is the primary goal of improving sepsis care in the medical industry. According to early detection findings, sepsis is one of the critical disorders that pose a challenge to many patients worldwide. The initiative’s primary goal is to identify people with the disease at an early stage and provide early diagnosis and treatment, especially at an early stage so that this criterion will lower mortality rates (Arora et al.,2019). According to extensive research, sepsis syndrome affects the young and old, which contributes to high death rates in many nations. According to the study, improving quality will raise awareness of the virus among more people. Intentionally, this program will encourage effective drugs and reduce the infection rate.

The target population is affected by the syndrome.

The most frequent cause of death for patients in the medical industry undergoing non-cardiac critical care is sepsis. Anyone can develop sepsis, For example, Infants, kids, the elderly, people recovering from trauma or surgery, and those with underlying medical disorders including diabetes, AIDS, cancer, or liver disease. Some people may be more or less sensitive to sepsis and deteriorate more quickly, while others recover more rapidly due to unidentified biological characteristics in their bodies. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), sepsis syndrome kills up to 11 million people yearly. The number of sepsis cases reported yearly has increased, affecting at least 49 million people annually. For example, in the United States, sepsis affects 1.7 million individuals yearly, raising fatalities by more than 270,000 people. Sepsis is now more widely known about and monitored; thus, there may be more cases than before. All infections are no longer successfully treated by antibiotics. Antibiotic-resistant disorders have the potential to cause sepsis. Furthermore, a person is more prone to get sepsis if they have had any operation requiring anaesthesia, for instance, an organ transplant.

The benefits of the quality improvement initiative enhancing sepsis care

In a big academic tertiary referral hospital, this study showed how multidisciplinary teamwork and quality improvement concepts could enhance the care delivery system and patient outcomes with changes that are both doable and long-lasting. The recently updated SCCM recommendations keep promoting measures to strengthen sepsis outcomes. A recent meta-analysis found that most studies back the use of EGDT-based bundles and the early start of antibiotic therapy. 19 Hospitals have been slow to implement standardized, evidence-based practices to manage severe sepsis and septic shock, despite the suggested recommendations and growing research that supports the guidelines( Delawder & Hulton, 2020). The current healthcare system does not support the interdisciplinary coordinated care required to deliver time-dependent treatments; hence the implementation will provide maintenance of high standards, improve treatment and diagnosis processes and optimize all the outcomes.

An Interprofessional Collaboration  Required to Implement the Quality Improvement Initiative

Basically, this experiment developed a collaborative, interprofessional strategy due to the early detection of patients suffering from sepsis syndrome. The medical department contains 38 beds and more than 40,000 visits from patients each year. Hence education is administered regarding the signs of sepsis and its management( Delawder & Hulton, 2020). Additionally, a screening and treatment algorithm tool has been put into place that features early detection indicators and suggestions for how to act in line with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign. Using the technique, the medical staff could assess the patient and identify whether sepsis was present and the severity of the condition( Rhee et al.,2021). Moreover, this experiment highlights the importance of sepsis education and teamwork in recognizing and treating sepsis patients. Other institutions might implement an interprofessional collaboration plan to combat the potentially lethal effects of sepsis.

 Overall cost justification for creating and initiating  quality improvement for optimizing sepsis care

Hospitals are spending much money, time, and effort to respond to screening and treatment of sepsis syndrome, including several hours of data abstraction and analyses of medical records. For instance, a single university hospital spent more than $150,000 per month responding to sepsis syndrome( Rhee et al.,2021). Following the review, Sepsis syndrome might not have accomplished its intended aim if hospitals were encouraged to use quality improvement initiative funds to boost adherence to procedures that did not increase survival rates. This method should accurately reflect the consequences of a policy like the treatment of Sepsis syndrome on a population of patients in whom doctors may have legitimately suspected symptoms at the time of care, as opposed to a population of patients in whom sepsis was identified retroactively by data abstractors. Furthermore, the link between timely sepsis bundling and mortality in a high-income setting is likely to result in conservative estimates despite this apparent constraint, so I believe this project initiative is acceptable.


As evidenced by the above research, sepsis is a potentially lethal condition that can be easily treated if detected early; however, late detection or non-treatment is frequently fatal. The created algorithm for treating sepsis patients in this project would significantly offer a framework for treatment and ensure the durability of the project’s results. On the other hand, suggestions to incorporate the algorithm into the electronic medical record have also been made to allow the implementation to function well without difficulty.






Arora, V., Strunk, D., Furqan, S. H., Schweig, L., Lefaiver, C., George, J., & Prazad, P. (2019). Optimizing antibiotic use for early-onset sepsis: a tertiary NICU experience. Journal of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine12(3), 301-312.

Delawder, J. M., & Hulton, L. (2020). An interdisciplinary code sepsis team to improve sepsis-bundle compliance: a quality improvement project. Journal of Emergency Nursing46(1), 91-98.

Rhee, C., Chiotos, K., Cosgrove, S. E., Heil, E. L., Kadri, S. S., Kalil, A. C., … & Klompas, M. (2021). Infectious Diseases Society of America position paper: recommended revisions to the severe national sepsis and septic shock early management bundle (SEP-1) sepsis quality measure. Clinical Infectious Diseases72(4), 541-552.




In this assignment, you will propose a quality improvement initiative from your place of employment that could easily be implemented if approved. Assume you are presenting this program to the board for approval of funding. Write an executive summary (750-1,000 words) to present to the board, from which the board will make its decision to fund your program or project. Include the following:

The purpose of the quality improvement initiative.
The target population or audience.
The benefits of the quality improvement initiative.
The interprofessional collaboration that would be required to implement the quality improvement initiative.
The cost or budget justification.
The basis upon which the quality improvement initiative will be evaluated.
You are required to cite a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.  

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

Order Now! Order Now!