The Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation is due by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7. The guidelines are listed below. The guidelines and grading rubric are also located in Course Resources.
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to: (a) identify and reflect upon key concepts related to your policymaker visit; (b) provide empirical evidence to support new insights gained regarding your policy issue and the policy making process; and (c) present ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner.
Course Outcomes
CO 1: Employ strategies to impact the development, implementation, and consequences of holistic-focused healthcare policies using evidence-based practice principles. (PO 1)
CO 2: Communicate with decision-makers to advocate for effective policies that impact nurses and nursing, consumers, or the healthcare system to foster population health including quality and safety. (PO 2)
CO 3: Demonstrate professional and personal growth concerning the advocacy role of the advanced practice nurse in fostering policy within diverse healthcare settings. (PO 3)
CO 4: Analyze social, historical, ethical, and political contexts of healthcare policies while integrating professional values to impact population health. (PO 4)
CO 5: Advocate for institutional, local, national, and international policies that fosters person-centered healthcare and nursing practice. (PO 5)
Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7
Total Points: 275 points
Requirements
Assignment Criteria for Presentation
- Describe your visit/presentation, including any PowerPoint presentation materials that you utilized during your policymaker visit. Limit these slides to five slides in this project (of the 15 total slides). This includes any handouts that you left with the policymaker.
- Discuss the response of the policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s).
- Reflect on the process, follow-up plans, insights gained about the issue and process, and support with evidence.
- Describe possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing.
- Provide concluding statements summarizing the content.
- Develop a 15-slide PowerPoint presentation with speaker notes in APA format, not including title and reference slides. Write speaker notes sufficient enough to enable someone to take over or give the presentation other than you.
Preparing the Presentation
After completing Policymaker Visit Ungraded Worksheet 3, develop an electronic presentation to describe, analyze, and reflect upon your policymaking visit. Include 5 slides from the PowerPoint presentation that you would have used during an actual policymaker visit. Include a minimum of five (5) classic or current references within the past 5 years that specifically support insights gained regarding your policy issue and the policymaking process.
Rubric
W7 Policymaker Presentation
| W7 Policymaker Presentation |
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVisit Description |
| 50.0 pts
Clearly describes the policymaking visit/presentation (includes actual presentation)
|
44.0 pts
Description of visit/presentation has rare inaccuracy.
|
40.0 pts
Description of visit/presentation lacks occasional important element or specificity.
|
19.0 pts
Description of visit/presentation has multiple instances of inaccuracies or is not addressed
|
0.0 pts
Does not identify, define or describe the healthcare policy.
|
|
50.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePolicymaker Response |
| 50.0 pts
Slides and speaker notes discuss response of policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s) and is clearly articulated.
|
44.0 pts
Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response has rare inaccuracy.
|
40.0 pts
Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response occasionally inaccurate or lacks occasional important elements or specificity.
|
19.0 pts
Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response has multiple inaccuracies or lacks sufficient level of detail.
|
0.0 pts
Slides and speaker notes do not discuss the policymaker response.
|
|
50.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflections on Process |
| 50.0 pts
Reflections on process (including supportive evidence), follow-up, and insights gained (issue and process) are clearly described in slide and speaker notes.
|
44.0 pts
Reflection on process, supportive evidence, follow-up, and insights gained has rare inaccuracy within slides and speaker notes.
|
40.0 pts
Occasionally inaccurate within slides and speaker notes or lacks occasional important elements or specificity.
|
19.0 pts
Reflection on process, evidence, follow-up, and insights is inaccurate within slides and speaker notes or lacks sufficient detail.
|
0.0 pts
There is no reflection on process.
|
|
50.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFuture Opportunities |
| 50.0 pts
Clearly describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing.
|
44.0 pts
Describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing with need for further detail or clarity.
|
40.0 pts
Clearly describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting but no mention of importance to nursing
|
19.0 pts
Minimal description of possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and no discussion of importance to nursing.
|
0.0 pts
Does not describe possible future opportunities or their importance to nursing.
|
|
50.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion |
| 45.0 pts
Concluding statements summarize content in a clear and articulated manner.
|
40.0 pts
Concluding statements summarizing content have rare inaccuracy or lack of minor details/clarity.
|
36.0 pts
Concluding statements lack occasional important element or specificity.
|
17.0 pts
Concluding statements have multiple instances of inaccuracies or little detail.
|
0.0 pts
No conclusion
|
|
45.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA format |
| 15.0 pts
Slides, speaker notes, and references are completely are free from APA errors throughout.
|
13.0 pts
There are 2-3 APA format errors.
|
12.0 pts
There are 4-6 APA format errors
|
6.0 pts
There are 6-7 APA format errors.
|
0.0 pts
Eight or more errors in APA, grammar, spelling and syntax and/or citations are missing
|
|
15.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation/Writing |
| 15.0 pts
Slide and speaker notes content are accurate. Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work. Balance among space, words/graphics, and color is effective.
|
13.0 pts
Presentations slides are professional in appearance and tone with rare exceptions. Slides are + 1 of required number. Speaker notes contain presentation content with rare repetition of slides. Speaker notes lack minor detail or clarity.
|
12.0 pts
Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone with occasional areas needing improvements in style. Slides are + 2 of required number. Speaker notes contain presentation content with occasional repetition of slides. Speaker notes lack detail or clarity.
|
6.0 pts
Most presentation slides are not professional in appearance and tone with numerous areas needing improvements in style. Slides are + 3 of required number. Speaker notes contain presentation content with multiple repetitions of slides or lack significant detail.
|
0.0 pts
Presentation includes numerous crowded slides and has no flow.
|
|
15.0 pts |
| Total Points: 275.0 |
PreviousNext
Submission
Submitted!
Apr 15 at 3:31pm
Submission Details
Download week 7 PPT Providing Equitable Healthcare to Georgia’s Undocumented Immigrants final copy.pptx
Grade: 275 (275 pts possible)
Graded Anonymously: no
View Rubric Evaluation
Comments:
Fride, I am sorry you were not able to secure a visit because I found your presentation to be exceptional. I very much appreciate your concern for undocumented immigrants and their healthcare needs. Henny
