Develop and submit a personal leadership philosophy that reflects what you think are characteristics of a good leader. Use the scholarly resources on leadership you selected to support your philosophy statement. Your personal leadership philosophy should include the following:· A description of your core values.· A personal mission statement, AND· a personal vision statement.
15 to >13.0 pts Excellent
The response accurately and thoroughly describes a set of core values. …The response clearly and thoroughly describes a personal mission statement and a personal vision statement.
13 to >11.0 pts Good
The response describes a set of core values. …The response describes a personal mission statement and a personal vision statement.
11 to >10.0 pts Fair
The response describes a set of core values that is vague or inaccurate. …The response describes a personal mission statement and vision statement that are vague or inaccurate.
10 to >0 pts Poor
The response describes a set of core values that is vague and inaccurate or is missing. …The response describes a personal mission/vision statement that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
· Analysis of your CliftonStrengths Assessment summarizing the results of your profile. · A description of two key behaviors you wish to strengthen. *not required to submit CliftonStrengths Assessment.
15 to >13.0 pts Excellent
The response accurately and completely provides an analysis and detailed summary of the CliftonStrengths Assessment. (Not required to submit Clifton Strengths Assessment.) …The response clearly and thoroughly describes two key behaviors to strengthen.
13 to >11.0 pts Good
The response accurately provides an analysis and summary of the CliftonStrengths Assessment. (Not required to submit Clifton Strengths Assessment.) …The response describes two key behaviors to strengthen.
11 to >10.0 pts Fair
The response provides an analysis and summary of the CliftonStrengths Assessment that is vague or inaccurate. (Not required to submit Clifton Strengths Assessment.) …The response describes two key behaviors to strengthen that is vague or inaccurate.
10 to >0 pts Poor
The response provides an analysis and summary of the CliftonStrengths Assessment that is vague and inaccurate or is missing. (Not required to submit Clifton Strengths Assessment.) …The response describes two key behaviors to strengthen that is vague and inaccurate or is missing.
· A development plan that explains how you plan to improve upon the two key behaviors you selected · An explanation of how you
50 to >44.0 pts Excellent
An accurate, complete, and
44 to >39.0 pts Good
An accurate development
39 to >34.0 pts Fair
A development plan is provided
34 to >0 pts Poor
A vague and inaccurate
Criteria Ratings Pts
5 pts
5 pts
plan to achieve your personal vision. Be specific and provide examples.
detailed development plan is provided that thoroughly explains plans to improve upon the two key behaviors selected. … The response accurately and thoroughly includes plans on how to achieve a personal vision with specific examples.
plan is provided that explains plans to improve upon the two key behaviors selected. … The response includes plans on how to achieve a personal vision with specific examples.
that explains plans to improve upon the two key behaviors selected that is vague or inaccurate. … The response includes vague or inaccurate plans on how to achieve a personal vision and may include some examples or examples are vague.
development plan is provided that explains plans to improve upon the two key behaviors selected or development plan is missing. … The response vaguely and inaccurately explains plans on how to achieve a personal vision, does not include any examples, or response is missing.
Resource Synthesis 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Using proper in- text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2 or 3 course- specific resources.
4 to >3.0 pts Good Using proper in- text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 1 course-specific resource.
3 to >2.0 pts Fair Using proper in- text citations, the response minimally integrates outside and course-specific resources.
2 to >0 pts Poor The response does not integrate outside and course-specific resources or no in-text citations are used.
Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which
4 to >3.0 pts Good Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated but
3 to >2.0 pts Fair Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60– 79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is
2 to >0 pts Poor Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or
Total Points: 100
Criteria Ratings Pts
5 pts
5 pts
statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria.
delineates all required criteria.
are brief and not descriptive.
vague or off topic.
conclusion is provided.
Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 to >3.0 pts Good
Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 to >2.0 pts Fair
Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
2 to >0 pts Poor
Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
4 to >3.0 pts Good
Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors.
3 to >2.0 pts Fair
Contains several (three or four) APA format errors.
2 to >0 pts Poor
Contains many (five or more) APA format errors.
Dissertation Consulting Company.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we\’ll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Why Hire Dissertation Consulting Company.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
